Friday, December 4, 2020

Critical Reflection

I started the module with two goals in mind – to be responsible and critical in my choices of words whether I am writing or presenting, and to be confident in my writing skills so that I can put across my messages easily and clearly. But today, at the end of this module, I gained more than what I aimed for, and I am grateful for that. I learnt to be cautious in what I write, to be critical in the language style and to have proper parallel structures. With the skills that gained in Effective Communication, I unconsciously found myself being extra cautious with the choice of words that I use in my reports and presentation slides of other modules. I will ensure that I do not make errors in my sentence structure and that I paraphrase properly when citing information off any external sourcesI also gained confidence in my writing skills so that the messages that I try to bring across is understood well. This is especially so when I had to write different reports for different modules and write-up the content while avoiding first-person pronouns. Avoiding first-person pronouns will give a better impression to the report as gives more formality. Other than that, I learnt that to put the message across easily in a presentation environmentit starts from having a good cover page for the presentation slides. This will allow the audience to get an idea of who I am, the date of the presentation and my focus on the issue that will be presented, making a good first impression of my presentation. 

On top of that, I have also gained teamwork skills. Throughout my education experience, this is the first time that I encountered an issue of an uncooperative team member. It was tough and challenging to move forward with the project when there are parts of the project that need to be done are still left untouched. However, this issue untangled slowly when my team tried to resolve this issue by talking about it to each other. It has not been easy to be pushing and reminding a team member to keep doing her part. But as the saying goes, “A team is as strong as its weakest link,” I learnt that the only way to move forward is to support one another in the team and guide the member that needs help. Through this, it has improved the communication boundaries within the team, and it has taught me that communication within the team is indeed important as it helps to remove the conflicts and doubts between each other. This experience has also forged a new friendship for me as I am comfortable in working and studying with my team members apart from the scope of the project. Moving forward, I will be more understanding of the unknown situation that my team members are facing and talk things out when things are not within my control to get the work done well.


One area that could have been addressed better is the interpersonal skills to increase my competency to interact with my team members and to socialise better. It would have allowed me to know and understand the ways to communicate better with others and this can avoid any conflicts. In a nutshell, Effective Communication has allowed me to grow in terms of my confidence; being more confident in presenting my slides awell as writing reports with proper language and format.


Thank you, Professor Blackstone, for making my 13 weeks of Effective Communication a great one. 

Saturday, November 14, 2020

Annotated summary

Shi, S., Tang, W., Wang, Y. (2017). A Review on Fatigue Driving Detection. ITM Web of Conferences             12, 01019. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/192105474.pdf

In this article, Shi et al. (2017) reviewed on the detection of fatigue driving. The issue of fatigue driving becoming a hazard on the road is being addressed. There are different methods to detect fatigue driving and its degree. A method used includes the driver’s psychological aspects; like brain waves, heart rate, pulse beat and breathing regularity, but these methods require the equipment to have direct contact with the driver. An alternative method used is based on the driver’s facial features like percentage of eyelid closure (PERCLOS), the detection of the driver’s head position, gaze direction, blink frequency and yawning. The results from the facial features detection may be difficult to obtain as the recognition of the algorithm is complex. Detaching from the driver, the vehicle’s driving parameters are also one of the detection methods to derive the degree of fatigue. Detection of the vehicle’s offset (from the travel path), vehicle’s speed, steering wheel angle and its wheel grip can also help with the analysis of fatigue driving. Despite the diverse methods available, further extensive research should be carried out to provide more robust detection results. Unfortunately, due to the lack of detection accuracy and its high cost, the fatigue detection technologies only appear on selected exclusive cars. This reflects the need for less expensive but high accuracy detection system for more cars in the future.

The article also provides useful information for our research project on the part of fatigue driving. It has aided in our understanding and widened our perspective about the availability of various methods that can detect the driver’s degree of fatigue. Different methods of detection have their own pros and cons and this article has reassured our team that the different methods can work hand-in-hand to detect the driver’s degree of fatigue. When various methods are combined, like the ones in our project; steering wheel grip detection, PERCLOS and blink frequency, they can provide more information to reflect the driver’s fatigue level.

Monday, October 19, 2020

Summary + Reader's Response (Final)

In the article “What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus,” written by Alistair Lewis (2020), an atmospheric scientist, understands that air pollution is as dire as the current coronavirus situation, especially in cities. He supports this statement by stating the similarities of health conditions issues between smog and coronavirus that increase the number of deaths. Lewis also mentions that exchange of views by people on “how air pollution affects the rates of mortality from the disease” was tough to conclude, considering the strong connection between both. He examines how the virus was transmitted globally to heavily populated cities, creating a platform for “rapid growth in infections.” Other than the exposure to air pollution, the frequent use of public transportation and high rates of poverty also “increase the prevalence of underlying health conditions” of individuals. When these factors pile up, those with the virus may have their health deteriorate further. Lockdown has positively impacted in purifying the air which helped control contamination of the virus. Overall, it is questionable that improving air pollution will proportionally ameliorate the spread of the disease. While the points Lewis mentioned are true, I feel like he did not discuss enough about how air pollution has increased the number of deaths in a country, how the attention given to air pollution should be as much as coronavirus and an explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution.

Firstly, Lewis should show the effects of air pollution on the number of deaths in a country before coronavirus. He mentions that the death rates of the virus are influenced by air pollution. However, Lewis does not show how air pollution could influence the number of deaths. According to Pereira, Silva & Solé (2020), air pollution is a well-known source of harm to the body, particularly the respiratory and circulatory systems, “being responsible for 7.6% of total global deaths in 2015”. This statement shows that air pollution brings about detrimental effects and on its own, has contributed to a large number of deaths.

Secondly, Lewis should explain how the attention that is given to coronavirus should have been given to air pollution as well. Lewis states that coronavirus started from a heavily populated country and spread to big cities which required immediate attention. The lack of resources; like materials and manpower to meet the demands of coronavirus has forcefully changed people’s behaviour. Air pollution can be as dreadful but due to the effects that happen over time, the consequences cannot be felt instantly, which could be the reason why interventions should be reinforced to ameliorate the environmental issues (Giani et al., 2020). This reflects that the effects of the virus can be seen drastically, which is why actions are taken instantly to improve the situation but this is not applied to air pollution.

Finally, a detailed explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution should be added. Lewis states that the relationship between coronavirus and air pollution could have “offered up hope in dark times of a practical way to reduce the effects of the virus". In my opinion, despite the adverse effects that COVID-19 has, it has brought about new light on how air pollution can be improved. Based on Narain (2020), lockdown “has severely restricted economic activity globally”. Comparing the satellite data of nitrogen oxide (NO2) during lockdown this year and the same period last year, the values have severely decreased. Figure 1 below is adapted from The World Bank, Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested depicts the vast changes of NO2 (Narain, 2020).



Figure 1. Severe decrease in NO2 across South Asia during the lockdown period.

It is undeniable that Lewis has valid points and he opened up a new perspective regarding the relationship of the virus and air pollution. But due to the period the article was written, data available is not enough to elaborate further to show the detailed relationship between both.

(No of words: 656)

References
Giani, P., Castruccio, S., Anav, A., Crippa, P., Hu, W., & Howard, D.  (2020, September 2). The Lancet. Short-term and long-term health impacts of air pollution reductions from COVID-19 lockdowns in China and Europe: a modelling study.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(20)30224-2/fulltext#seccestitle130

Lewis, A. (2020, 13 May). What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus. https://theconversation.com/what-we-do-and-dont-know-about-the-links-between-air-pollution-and-coronavirus-137746

M. Urrutia-Pereira, C.A. Mello-da-Silva, and D. Solé. (2020, September-October) COVID-19 and air pollution: A dangerous association? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328542/

Narain, U. (2020, July 2) The World Bank. Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2020/07/01/air-pollution-locked-down-by-covid-19-but-not-arrested

The World Bank. (2020). Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested. Narain, U.

Monday, October 12, 2020

Reader's Response Draft 2

In the article “What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus,” written by Alistair Levis (2020), an atmospheric scientist, understands that air pollution is as dire as the current coronavirus situation, especially in cities. He supports this statement by stating the similarities of health conditions issues between smog and coronavirus that increase the number of deaths. Levis also mentions that exchange of views by people on “how air pollution affects the rates of mortality from the disease” was tough to conclude considering the strong connection between both. He examines how the virus was transmitted globally to heavily populated cities, creating a platform for “rapid growth in infections.” Other than the exposure to air pollution, the frequent use of public transportation and high rates of poverty also “increase the prevalence of underlying health conditions” of individuals. When these factors pile up, those with the virus may have their health deteriorate further. Lockdown had positively impacted in purifying the air which helped control contamination of the virus. If the disease spreads far from the origin city of infection, it may be possible to track the relation of the environment with the virus itself. Overall, it is questionable that improving air pollution will proportionally ameliorate the spread of the disease. While the points Levis mentioned are true, I feel like he did not discuss enough how air pollution has been a strain to the number of deaths in a country, how the attention is given to coronavirus should have given to air pollution as well explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution.

Firstly, Levis should have shown how air pollution has been a strain to the number of deaths in a country before coronavirus. It was mentioned that the death rates of the virus are influenced by air pollution. However, it does not show the full picture of how air pollution could cause big damage to the number of deaths. According to Urrutia-Pereira, Mello-da-Silva &Solé (2020), air pollution is a well-known source of harm to the body, particularly the respiratory and circulatory systems, “being responsible for 7.6% of total global deaths in 2015”. Based on this statement, it is undeniable that air pollution brings about detrimental effects and has contributed to a large number of deaths.

Secondly, a brief explanation of how the attention is given to coronavirus should have been given to air pollution as well. Levis states that coronavirus started from a heavily populated country and spread expeditiously to other big cities which required immediate attention. In my opinion, air pollution is as dire an issue as coronavirus, which is why it should be given as much attention as coronavirus. The lack of resources to meet the demands of coronavirus has forcefully changed people’s behaviour. Unlike air pollution, the effects of the virus can be seen drastically. Air pollution can be as dreadful but due to the effects that happen over time, the consequences cannot be felt instantly, which could be the reason why interventions should be reinforced to ameliorate the environmental issues (Giani et al., 2020).

Finally, a detailed explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution. Levis states that the relationship between coronavirus and air pollution could have “offered up hope in dark times of a practical way to reduce the effects of the virus". In my opinion, despite the adverse effects that COVID-19 has to the world, it has definitely brought about new light on how air pollution can be improved. Based on the article Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested (2020), lockdown “has severely restricted economic activity globally”. Comparing the satellite data of nitrogen oxide (NO2) during lockdown this year and the same period last year, the values have severely decreased (Narain, 2020). Figure 1 (The World Bank, 2020) below, depicts the vast changes of NO2.

Figure 1: Severe decrease of NO2 across South Asia during the lockdown period

It is undeniable that Levis has valid points and he opened up a new perspective regarding the relationship of the virus and air pollution. But due to the period the article was written, data available are not enough to elaborate further to show the detailed relationship between both.

References:
Giani, P., Castruccio, S., Anav, A., Crippa, P., Hu, W., & Howard, D.  (2020, September 2). The Lancet. Short-term and long-term health impacts of air pollution reductions from COVID-19 lockdowns in China and Europe: a modelling study. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(20)30224-2/fulltext#seccestitle130

Levis, A. (2020). What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus. https://theconversation.com/what-we-do-and-dont-know-about-the-links-between-air-pollution-and-coronavirus-137746

M. Urrutia-Pereira, C.A. Mello-da-Silva, and D. Solé. (2020) COVID-19 and air pollution: A dangerous association? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328542/

Narain, U. (2020, July 2) The World Bank. Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2020/07/01/air-pollution-locked-down-by-covid-19-but-not-arrested

Thursday, October 8, 2020

Reader's Response

In the article “What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus,” written by Alistair Levis (2020), an atmospheric scientist, understands that air pollution is as dire as the current coronavirus situation, especially in cities. He supports this statement by stating the similarities of health conditions issues between smog and coronavirus that increase the number of deaths. Levis also mentions that exchange of views by people on “how air pollution affects the rates of mortality from the disease” was tough to conclude considering the strong connection between both. He examines how the virus was transmitted globally to heavily populated cities, creating a platform for “rapid growth in infections.” Other than the exposure to air pollution, the frequent use of public transportation and high rates of poverty also “increase the prevalence of underlying health conditions” of individuals. When these factors pile up, those with the virus may have their health deteriorate further. Lockdown had positively impacted in purifying the air which helped control contamination of the virus8. If the disease spreads far from the origin city of infection, it may be possible to track the relation of the environment with the virus itself. Overall, it is questionable that improving air pollution will proportionally ameliorate the spread of the disease. While the points Levis mentioned are true, I feel like he did not discuss enough how air pollution has been a strain to the number of deaths in a country, how the attention is given to coronavirus should have given to air pollution as well explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution.

First things first, Levis should have shown how air pollution has been a strain to the number of deaths in a country before coronavirus. It was mentioned that the death rates of the virus are influenced by air pollution. However, it does not show the full picture of how air pollution itself could cause big damage to the number of deaths. According to Urrutia-Pereira, Mello-da-Silva &Solé (2020), air pollution is a well-known source of harm to the body, particularly the respiratory and circulatory systems, “being responsible for 7.6% of total global deaths in 2015”. Based on this statement, it is undeniable that air pollution brings about detrimental effects and has contributed to a large number of deaths.

Secondly, a brief explanation of how the attention is given to coronavirus should have been given to air pollution as well. Levis (2020) states that coronavirus started from a heavily populated country and spread expeditiously to other big cities which require immediate attention. In my opinion, air pollution is as dire an issue as coronavirus, which is why it should be given as much attention as coronavirus. The lack of resources to meet the demands of coronavirus has forcefully changed people’s behaviour. Unlike air pollution, the effects of the virus can be seen drastically. Air pollution can be as dreadful but due to the effects that happen over time, the consequences cannot be felt instantly, which could be the reason why interventions should be reinforced to ameliorate the environmental issues (Giani et al., 2020).

Finally, a detailed explanation of how the lockdown due to coronavirus may have changed the perspective of air pollution. Levis (2020) states that the relationship between coronavirus and air pollution could have “offered up hope in dark times of a practical way to reduce the effects of the virus". In my opinion, despite the adverse effects that Covid-19 has to the world, it has definitely brought about new light on how air pollution can be improved. Based on the article Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested (2020), lockdown “has severely restricted economic activity globally”. Comparing the satellite data of nitrogen oxide (NO2) during lockdown this year and the same period last year, the values have severely decreased (Narain, 2020). Figure 1 (The World Bank, 2020) below, depicts the vast changes of NO2.

Figure 1: Severe decrease of NO2 across South Asia during the lockdown period

It is undeniable that Levis has valid points and he opened up a new perspective regarding the relationship of the virus and air pollution. But due to the period the article was written, data available are not enough to elaborate further to show the detailed relationship between both.

No of words: 652

References:
Giani, P., Castruccio, S., Anav, A., Crippa, P., Hu, W., & Howard, D.  (2020, September 2). The Lancet. Short-term and long-term health impacts of air pollution reductions from COVID-19 lockdowns in China and Europe: a modelling study. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(20)30224-2/fulltext#seccestitle130

Levis, A. (2020). What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus. https://theconversation.com/what-we-do-and-dont-know-about-the-links-between-air-pollution-and-coronavirus-137746

M. Urrutia-Pereira, C.A. Mello-da-Silva, and D. Solé. (2020) COVID-19 and air pollution: A dangerous association? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328542/

Narain, U. (2020, July 2) The World Bank. Air Pollution: Locked Down by COVID-19 but Not Arrested. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/immersive-story/2020/07/01/air-pollution-locked-down-by-covid-19-but-not-arrested

 Draft 1

Monday, September 28, 2020

Summary on article - Air Pollution and Coronavirus

In the article “What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus,” written by Alistair Levis (2020), an atmospheric scientist, understands that air pollution is as dire as the current coronavirus situation, especially in cities. He supports this statement by stating the similarities of health conditions issues between smog and coronavirus that increase the number of deaths. Alistair also mentions that exchange of views by people on “how air pollution affects the rates of mortality from the disease” was tough to conclude considering the strong connection between both. He examines how the virus was transmitted globally to heavily populated cities, creating a platform for “rapid growth in infections.” Other than the exposure to air pollution, the frequent use of public transportation and high rates of poverty also “increase the prevalence of underlying health conditions” of individuals. When these factors pile up, those with the virus may have their health deteriorate further. Besides, lockdown not only helps people realize that the air got cleaner but also reduces “the effects of the virus.”. If the disease spreads far from the origin city of infection, it may be possible to track the relation of the environment with the virus itself. Overall, it is questionable that improving air pollution will proportionally ameliorate the spread of the disease.

Alistair Levis (2020). What We Do and Don’t Know about the Links between Air Pollution and Coronavirus. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/what-we-do-and-dont-know-about-the-links-between-air-pollution-and-coronavirus-137746

No of words: 204

Draft 1: 28/09/2020
Draft 2: 01/10/2020
Draft 3: 4/10/2020

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

Formal Letter

Subject: Self-introduction about myself

Dear Professor Blackstone,

Good day to you.

I am Nurul ‘Izzati Zulkifli and the purpose of this letter is to introduce myself to you as your effective communication student. I recently graduated from Singapore Polytechnic with a diploma in mechanical engineering. I am interested in engineering as I hope to be a part of a team who can build buildings, protect and improve the environment. The systems in buildings intrigue me, which is why I decided to further my studies in sustainable infrastructure engineering.

One of my communication strengths is listening. I believe that I can understand better what one is saying if I am an active listener to respond appropriately. There are many instances where my friends would approach me to share their worries when they need a listening ear. Communication goes both ways and being a good listener can create trust between two people.

One of my weaknesses in communication is with the usage of hesitation words. I often use words like “uh” and “umm” which may express uncertainty and ambiguity in what I am trying to put across. This is especially obvious when I am doing presentations and questions are being directed to me. This often affects my self-confidence when I am in front of a group of people.

Two goals that I would like to achieve at the end of this module are to be responsible and critical in my choices of words whether I am writing or presenting and to be confident in my writing skills so that I can put across my messages easily and clearly.

I believe what strikes me out of others is that I am an adventurer who is always willing to try out something new despite having to do it on my own. Although I sometimes self-doubt in my capabilities in the things that I do, I hold on to the opportunities that allow me to grow through the experience. One example would be how I managed to handle a new application all on my own during my internship. I had to self-learn its functions and meet the demands of the department that I was working for. Thankfully, I braved through that challenge and managed to give what the department needed.

Thank you for your time.

Best Regards,
'Izzati


Updated: 21/09/2020

Read: Valencia's, Sarmila's

Critical Reflection

I started the module with two goals in mind – to be   responsible and critical in my choices of words whether I am writing or presenting, an...